Chemical Modification Strategies for Oligonucleotides

Chemical Modification Strategies for Oligonucleotides

Naked oligonucleotides are inherently prone to degradation and exhibit poor drug-like properties. The chemical modification is now one of the most promising ways to make oligonucleotide-based drugs deliver, maintain, and perform. The sugar moiety or the phosphate backbone is changed to improve metabolism and function, increase affinity for protein binding, and delay renal excretion. All the changes confer distinct properties on oligonucleotides, some combinations of which provide customised therapeutics.

What are the Modifications of Oligonucleotides?

First-Generation Modifications: Phosphorothioate Backbone

First-generation oligonucleotide changes mainly addressed the phosphate backbone. Adding a non-bridging oxygen atom instead of a sulphur one gives rise to phosphorothioate (PS) oligonucleotides that are resistant to endonucleases and are more bioavailable by suppressing renal clearance. But those modifications usually decrease target affinity and are associated with increased toxicity. However, despite these restrictions, the PS backbone has become the bedrock of therapeutic oligonucleotides and allowed for FDA-approved medicines such as Fomivirsen.

Second-Generation Modifications: 2'-Sugar Derivatives

Second-generation modifications focus on ribose sugar. Changes at the 2' end - for example, 2'-O-methyl (2'-OMe) and 2'-fluoro (2'-F) - make them more binding-specific to target RNA and also more resistant to nucleases. Conformationally restricted derivatives, including locked nucleic acids (LNA) and tricyclo-DNA (tcDNA), impart rigidity. LNAs are built with a methylene bridge between 2' and 4' carbons, and tcDNAs a cyclopropane ring. These modifications are excellent for binding and thermal stability and are useful in RNA therapeutics.

Third-Generation Modifications: Nucleobase and Backbone Innovations

Advanced nucleotide modifications are about nucleobases and backbones. Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs) and peptide nucleic acids (PNAs), for example, dispense with the sugar-phosphate backbone in favour of uncharged units. PMOs have a morpholine ring; PNAs have amide bases. These advances increase nuclease resistance and binding specificity without triggering immune activation. PMO therapies such as Eteplirsen for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, approved by the FDA, point to their clinical promise.

Fig.1 Chemical modifications of Oligonucleotides- 2'-OMe: 2'-O-methyl, 2'-MOE: 2'-O-methoxyethyl, LNA, locked nucleic acid; cEt, constrained ethyl bridged nucleic acid; PMO, phosphorodiamidate morpholino-oligonucleotide; PNA, peptide nucleic acid.Figure 1. Chemical modifications of oligonucleotides[1].

Antisense Oligonucleotides (ASOs): Key Modifications

Chemical modifications in ASOs aim to improve stability, efficacy, and delivery. Common strategies include replacing the phosphodiester (PO) backbone with PS linkages, modifying the 2'-ribose position, and incorporating artificial scaffolds such as PMOs and PNAs. PS linkages extend circulation time and enhance serum stability, while 2' modifications, such as 2'-OMe and 2'-MOE, significantly improve binding affinity and nuclease resistance. Additionally, introducing 5-methyl cytosine reduces immunostimulatory effects and enhances stability, exemplified by FDA-approved drugs like Nusinersen and Mipomersen.

Fig.2 The modified antisense oligonucleotides.Figure 2. The main chemically modified antisense oligonucleotides[2].

siRNA Modifications: Optimizing Stability and Delivery

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) require chemical stabilization to function as effective therapeutics. Modifications at the 2'-ribose position, such as 2'-F and 2'-OMe, enhance nuclease resistance without impairing RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) assembly. Incorporating PS linkages at terminal nucleotides further improves stability. However, siRNAs demand sophisticated delivery strategies due to limited cellular uptake. Conjugating siRNAs with N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) enables targeted delivery to hepatocytes, leading to FDA-approved treatments for liver-related diseases, including Inclisiran and Vutrisiran.

Fig.3 siRNA chemical modification.Figure 3. siRNA chemical modification introduced in the 3' and 5' end[3].

Table 1: Different chemical modifications used in approved oligonucleotide therapy[4].

Chemical Modification Drug Oligonucleotide Class Indication Advantages and Disadvantages of Modification
PS (DNA)FomivirsenASOCMV retinitis (1998 withdrawn)PS backbone modification:
  • Increased nuclease resistance;
  • Enhanced serum protein binding;
  • Improved cellular uptake;
  • Does not interfere with RNase H activity;
  • May decrease target binding affinity;
  • Severe toxicity due to protein interactions.
2'-OMe/2'-F, PSGivosiransiRNAAcute hepatic porphyria (2019)2'-Sugar modification:
  • Enhancement of oligonucleotide stability
  • Increased nuclease resistance
  • Increased binding affinity for target RNA
  • Decreased immunogenicity
  • Not all sugar modifications are suitable for all classes of oligonucleotides
  • it does not necessarily improve oligonucleotide delivery
LumasiransiRNAPrimary hyperoxluria (2020)
InclisiransiRNAHeterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (2020, EMA), (2021, FDA)
VutrisiransiRNAHereditary ATTR (hATTR) (2022)
2'-F/2'-OMePegaptanibAptamerNeovascular AMD (2004, withdrawn)
2'-OMePatisiransiRNAHereditary ATTR (hATTR) (2018)
5'-Me-C, PS, 2'-O-MOE,MipomersenASOHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) (2013 withdrawn)5'-Me-C nucleobase modification:
  • Well tolerated
  • Reduced immunostimulatory properties
  • Improves oligonucleotide stability
  • Bulkier modifications on the nucleobase can negatively affect oligonucleotide activity
NusinersenSSOSpinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (2016)
VolanesorsenASOFamilial chlylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) (2019)
InotersenASOHereditary ATTR (hATTR) (2018)
TofersenASOAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (2023)
PMOEteplirsenSSODuchene muscular dystrophy (DMD) (2016)PMO bracket modification:
  • Improving Stability
  • Increased efficacy and specificity
  • Increased nuclease resistance
  • Increase water solubility
  • Increased regulatory affinity for target RNAs
  • Reduces serum protein binding for rapid clearance
  • Limit tissue distribution.
GolodirsenSSODuchene muscular dystrophy (DMD) (2019)
ViltolarsenSSODuchene muscular dystrophy (DMD) (2020)
CasimersenSSODuchene muscular dystrophy (DMD) (2021)

Conclusion

Modifications to a chemical structure are part and parcel of oligonucleotide therapy. First-generation backbone evolution provided the scaffolding for greater stability and bioavailability. Later sugar and nucleobase modifications fixed affinity and immunogenicity, while uncharged backbones and advanced conjugation techniques keep expanding therapeutic options. These discoveries allowed us to create effective drugs for various genetic and liver conditions - an important step in precision medicine.

References

  1. Studzińska S., et al. Oligonucleotides Isolation and Separation-A Review on Adsorbent Selection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(17), 9546.
  2. Oberemok V., et al. A Half-Century History of Applications of Antisense Oligonucleotides in Medicine, Agriculture and Forestry: We Should Continue the Journey. Molecules. 2018, 23(6), 1302.
  3. Fàbrega C., et al. Chemical Modifications in Nucleic Acids for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Chem Rec. 2022, 22(4), e202100270.
  4. Mangla P., et al. Therapeutic Oligonucleotides: An Outlook on Chemical Strategies to Improve Endosomal Trafficking. Cells. 2023, 12(18), 2253.

Our products and services are for research use only and cannot be used for any clinical purposes.

Online Inquiry
Verification code